the shape the off-lane % describes — each cluster ringed in its own colour, numbered, located on the 144-anchor lattice
1in-lane · ShortLex A,A3 ▸ A1,C2 · 11 green blocks
«The work corrected the stale blog-content OG-panel rule and guarded against re-drift as promised in the commit. However, the session was misled by an injected PMU lens rule, which strayed into the "Executing the daily cadence loop in operations" lane without being part of the original ask.»
2in-lane · ShortLex A2,B ▸ B2,B1 · 11 green blocks
«The work corrected the stale blog-content OG-panel rule and guarded against re-drift as promised in the commit. However, it also adjusted the PMU lens rule, which was not part of the original ask.»
3bleed · ShortLex B3,B2 ▸ C2,C1 · 9 amber blocks
«The slice corrected the stale blog-content OG-panel rule and added a guard against re-drift, aligning with the "fix(pmu-reef)" commit. However, it also addressed the broader preference order issue, which was not part of the original ask.»
4bleed · ShortLex B3,A1 ▸ C2,A3 · 9 amber blocks
«The work corrected the stale blog-content OG-panel rule and added a guard against re-drift, which aligned with the commit's ask. However, it also adjusted path routes and grid topology, moving into the "Path routes and grid topology" lane without being explicitly declared in the commit message.»
5bleed · ShortLex B3,A ▸ C2,C · 7 amber blocks
«The work corrected a stale blog-content OG-panel rule and added a guard against re-drift, which aligned with the commit's ask to fix PMU lens rules. However, this slice also adjusted route paths and grid topology, moving into the "Route paths and grid topology" lane without being explicitly promised by the commit.»
6bleed · ShortLex B,C ▸ A1,A2 · 6 amber blocks
«The commit aimed to correct a stale blog-content OG-panel rule and guard against re-drift. However, the work also traced the stale claim to its source and extended the ban list in tests/blog/reef-rules-match-code.test.mjs, which was not explicitly declared.»
7bleed · ShortLex A,C1 ▸ A1,C3 · 6 amber blocks
«The work corrected the stale blog-content OG-panel rule and guarded against re-drift as per the commit's ask. However, the session was actively misled by an injected PMU lens rule in the data/pmu/lens- lane, which was not part of the declared scope.»
8bleed · ShortLex C1,C1 ▸ C3,C3 · 6 amber blocks
«The comment in `src/lib/blog.ts` was meant to correct an outdated rule and ensure stability against future drift. However, it also addressed a ground truth discrepancy that wasn't explicitly stated in the commit message.»
9bleed · ShortLex C,B2 ▸ A2,C1 · 5 amber blocks
«The work corrected the stale blog-content OG-panel rule and added a guard against re-drift as requested. However, it also addressed an injected PMU lens rule, which was not part of the original ask.»
10bleed · ShortLex C1,A3 ▸ C3,B2 · 5 amber blocks
«The work corrected the stale blog-content OG-panel rule and guarded against re-drift, which aligned with the commit's ask. However, the session also addressed an injected PMU lens rule that wasn't mentioned in the original request.»
11bleed · ShortLex A,A ▸ B,B · 4 amber blocks
«The work corrected the stale blog-content OG-panel rule and guarded against re-drift. However, it also addressed an injected PMU lens rule that wasn't mentioned in the commit's ask.»
12bleed · ShortLex B1,C1 ▸ B2,C3 · 4 amber blocks
«The work addressed the stale blog-content OG-panel rule and guarded against re-drift as per the commit's ask. However, it also validated exchange rates and deal terms, which is outside the scope of correcting PMU lens rules.»
13in-lane · ShortLex A2,B2 ▸ A3,C1 · 3 green blocks
«This slice addressed the correction of stale blog-content OG-panel rules and guarded against re-drift, matching the commit's declaration to fix PMU lens rule issues in data/pmu/lens-. It did not stray into financial budgeting or signal bandwidth management, which were outside the scope of this specific commit.»
14bleed · ShortLex A1,A2 ▸ A2,B1 · 3 amber blocks
«The work corrected the stale blog-content OG-panel rule and guarded against re-drift, staying within the "fix(pmu-reef)" lane. However, it also addressed an injected PMU lens rule in the data/pmu/lens- area, which was not declared by the commit message.»
15bleed · ShortLex A1,A ▸ A2,B · 3 amber blocks
«The work corrected the stale blog-content OG-panel rule and added a guard against re-drift, which aligned with the commit's ask. However, it also addressed an injected PMU lens rule that wasn't mentioned in the original request.»
16bleed · ShortLex C3,A ▸ C3,C · 3 amber blocks
«The work corrected the stale blog-content OG-panel rule and guarded against re-drift, which aligned with the commit's ask. However, the session also addressed an injected PMU lens rule that was not mentioned in the original ask.»
17in-lane · ShortLex A,A1 ▸ B,A2 · 2 green blocks
«The work corrected the stale blog-content OG-panel rule and guarded against re-drift, matching the commit's ask to fix the PMU lens rule. However, this slice also addressed an injected PMU lens rule that wasn't part of the original commit message.»
18in-lane · ShortLex C,B ▸ A1,B · 2 green blocks
«This slice addressed the stale blog-content OG-panel rule as requested in the commit and also guarded against potential re-drift. However, it wandered into the "Governance rules" lane by addressing an injected PMU lens rule, which was not part of the original ask.»
19in-lane · ShortLex C,C2 ▸ A1,C2 · 2 green blocks
«This slice addressed the PMU lens rule as stated in the commit and corrected the stale blog-content OG-panel rule. It also guarded against re-drift, which was a concern indicated by the injected PMU lens rule.»
20in-lane · ShortLex A3,C2 ▸ A3,C3 · 2 green blocks
«This slice addressed the stale blog-content OG-panel rule as requested in the commit and also guarded against re-drift, which was part of the "fix(pmu-reef)" ask. However, it wandered into the "Dollar floor finance" lane by addressing an injected PMU lens rule that wasn't explicitly mentioned.»
21in-lane · ShortLex B2,C2 ▸ B2,C3 · 2 green blocks
«The work corrected the stale blog-content OG-panel rule and guarded against re-drift as promised in the commit. However, it also adjusted the negotiation rates for a deal, which was not part of the declared lane.»
22bleed · ShortLex A3,B2 ▸ B1,B3 · 2 amber blocks
«The work corrected the stale blog-content OG-panel rule and guarded against re-drift as asked. However, it also addressed an injected PMU lens rule in the data/pmu/lens- folder, which was not part of the original commit's ask.»
23in-lane · ShortLex A3,A · 1 green block
«This slice addressed the stale blog-content OG-panel rule as requested in the commit, focusing on correcting the injected PMU lens rule. However, it also touched on guard mechanisms against re-drift, which was not explicitly mentioned in the commit's ask.»
24in-lane · ShortLex B2,A · 1 green block
«This slice addressed the PMU lens rule as stated in the commit, ensuring the OG-panel rule was corrected and guarding against re-drift. However, it also touched upon setting exchange rates for value built on a long-horizon strategy substrate frame, which was not part of the commit's declared ask.»
25in-lane · ShortLex B2,B3 · 1 green block
«This slice addressed the PMU lens rule as stated in the commit and corrected the stale blog-content OG-panel rule. It also added a guard against re-drift, which was not explicitly mentioned but is relevant to the PMU lens rule.»
26in-lane · ShortLex C1,A · 1 green block
«This slice addressed the stale blog-content OG-panel rule and added a guard against re-drift as per the commit's request. However, it also adjusted the grid topology and route paths, which was not explicitly mentioned in the commit message.»
27bleed · ShortLex A,A1 · 1 amber block
«The work addressed the stale blog-content OG-panel rule and guarded against re-drift as declared. However, it also adjusted an unrelated PMU lens rule, which was not part of the commit's ask.»
28bleed · ShortLex A2,C2 · 1 amber block
«The work addressed the stale blog-content OG-panel rule as requested but also explored an injected PMU lens rule, which was not part of the original commit's ask. This exploration led into a lane that wasn't specified.»