the shape the off-lane % describes — each cluster ringed in its own colour, numbered, located on the 144-anchor lattice
1bleed · ShortLex C,A ▸ C,C3 · 12 amber blocks
«The slice routed CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as requested, but also included a migration that restores persisted /hive counts. This wandered into the "Cadence in daily operations" lane, which was not part of the original commit's ask.»
2bleed · ShortLex C,B3 ▸ B1,C3 · 10 amber blocks
«The work set out to route CTA links through the existing click-signal loop and confirm a signal email, staying within the "feat(bookclub)" lane. However, this slice also touched on quarterly goal targets, which was not part of the commit's ask.»
3bleed · ShortLex C,A2 ▸ A2,B2 · 9 amber blocks
«The work routed CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as requested, but it also included a confirmation email that was not part of the original ask. This added an extra step that wasn't specified in the commit message.»
4drift · ShortLex B2,C ▸ C1,A2 · 9 red blocks
«The work routed CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as requested, but also broadcasted a confirmation email to an operator who confirmed the signal. This wandered into the "Signal reach and message broadcast channels" lane, which was not declared in the commit's ask.»
5drift · ShortLex B2,B3 ▸ C1,C2 · 9 red blocks
«The slice fired a signal email when a /hive|/pixel|/book click occurred, which was consistent with the commit's request to route CTA links through the existing click-signal loop. However, this triggered an additional 'X clicked /article14 · campaign …' signal email that wasn't part of the original ask.»
6bleed · ShortLex A,A ▸ A3,C · 8 amber blocks
«The work aimed to route CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as per the campaign-tagged signal email. However, it wandered into the governance rules lane, which was not part of the commit's ask.»
7drift · ShortLex C1,A ▸ C3,C · 8 red blocks
«The work routed CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as asked, but also included operator confirmation emails, which were not part of the original commit. This added a feedback loop check that was outside the scope declared.»
8drift · ShortLex C1,A3 ▸ C3,B2 · 8 red blocks
«The work routed CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as requested, but also included operator confirmation emails, which were not part of the original ask. This wandered into the "Feedback loop measures and hypothesis tests" lane, which was out of spec for this commit.»
9drift · ShortLex C1,C1 ▸ C3,C3 · 7 red blocks
«The work reused the existing outreach loop by appending the same signed `?t=` token. This approach aligned with the commit's goal of routing CTA links through the click-signal loop but introduced a new lane not specified in the original ask, which involved using an outreach-specific token.»
10in-lane · ShortLex A3,A3 ▸ A3,C2 · 6 green blocks
«This slice implemented the CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as requested. The operator confirmed a 'X clicked /article14 · campaign …' signal email, aligning perfectly with the commit's ask.»
11bleed · ShortLex A3,C ▸ B1,B1 · 6 amber blocks
«The work aimed to route CTA links through the existing click-signal loop but wandered into ensuring the quarterly goal and target position were occupied on time. This was not part of the commit's declared ask.»
12bleed · ShortLex A,B2 ▸ A,C3 · 5 amber blocks
«The work aimed to route CTA links through the existing click-signal loop (campaign-tagged) as per the commit's request. However, it also included a confirmation email that wasn't part of the original ask.»
13bleed · ShortLex C,C ▸ A2,A1 · 5 amber blocks
«The work routed CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as asked, but also included a confirmation email that wasn't part of the original plan. This wandered into the "EU AI Act Article 14 requires human-on-the-loop oversight" lane, which was not specified in the commit.»
14bleed · ShortLex C,B3 ▸ A2,C1 · 5 amber blocks
«The work routed CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as requested by the commit. However, it also processed campaign-tagged signals, which was not part of the original ask.»
15bleed · ShortLex C,C3 ▸ B1,C3 · 4 amber blocks
«The work aimed to route CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as per the commit's request. However, it also included an email confirmation that wasn't part of the original ask.»
16in-lane · ShortLex A,A1 ▸ B,A3 · 4 green blocks
«The work implemented CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as requested. This aligns with the "feat(bookclub)" commit's goal of routing these links via the current mechanism.»
17in-lane · ShortLex B,B3 ▸ B,C3 · 4 green blocks
«The work set out to route CTA links through the existing click-signal loop and confirm its functionality based on an operator's confirmation of a "X clicked /article14 · campaign …" signal email. This matches the commit’s ask to test the hypothesis within the iterative feedback loop.»
18drift · ShortLex B2,A3 ▸ C1,B1 · 4 red blocks
«The work routed CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as asked, but also included operator confirmation emails, which were not part of the original commit. This wandered into the "bandwidth limits" lane, broadening the message beyond what was specified.»
19in-lane · ShortLex A3,B ▸ A3,A1 · 3 green blocks
«The work set out to route CTA links through the existing click-signal loop and confirm the signal email. This matches the "Finance provides the budget runway and dollar floor that sustains daily operations and the execution loop" lens, as it directly supports the operational loop.»
20drift · ShortLex A1,B1 ▸ A1,B3 · 3 red blocks
«The work routed CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as requested, but also triggered a confirmation email that was not part of the original ask. This wandered into the "human-on-the-loop oversight" lane, which was out of spec for this commit.»
21in-lane · ShortLex A1,A1 ▸ A1,A2 · 2 green blocks
«The slice implemented the CTA link routing through the existing click-signal loop as requested. This matched the "feat(bookclub)" lane and aligned with confirming a specific operator signal.»
22drift · ShortLex C2,A1 ▸ C3,A2 · 2 red blocks
«The work routed CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as asked, but also included operator confirmation emails, which were not part of the original commit. This wandered into the "Measured pipeline throughput and delivery rates" lane, tracking progress toward quarterly goals, even though it wasn't explicitly promised.»
23drift · ShortLex B2,C3 ▸ B3,C3 · 2 red blocks
«The work routed CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as requested by the commit. However, the operator noticed that a confirmation email was sent to an unintended audience, which wasn't part of the original ask.»
24drift · ShortLex B3,A ▸ B3,B · 2 red blocks
«The work routed CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as asked, but also included operator confirmation emails, which were not part of the original commit. This wandered into the "Reach of a signal and the message bandwidth" lane, broadening the channel beyond what was specified.»
25in-lane · ShortLex A1,C2 · 1 green block
«The work routed CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as requested, aligning with the "Compliance governance articles" lane. The operator confirmed the signal email, ensuring the process stayed within the declared scope.»
26bleed · ShortLex A,A3 · 1 amber block
«The work routed CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as asked, but also included operator confirmation emails, which were not part of the original commit. This wandered into the "A strategy lattice" lane, where confirming emails are out of scope.»
27drift · ShortLex C3,A1 · 1 red block
«The work routed CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as asked, but also included operator confirmation emails, which were not part of the original commit. This wandered into the "Flow rate and delivery throughput" lane, which was out of spec for this commit.»
28drift · ShortLex C3,B3 · 1 red block
«The work routed CTA links through the existing click-signal loop as asked, but also triggered an email confirmation that wasn't part of the original request. This wandered into the "pipeline throughput and flow rate" lane, which was not specified in the commit.»